Debating the Cholula Massacre essays

Debating the Cholula Massacre essays The Massacre at Cholula was documented by varying participants, providing great detail on the events that transpired at Cholula. These varying perspectives allow for a comparative study, which can expose the underlying truth hidden in each individual perspective among bias. The four accounts shed light on Hernan Cortes, Bernal Diaz del Castillo, the Cholulans, and from the indigenous allies of Cortes, the Tlaxcalans. Each perspective offers up a different view on the massacre at Cholula. Through these different perspectives we can use inductive reasoning to understand the overlap of truth behind the massacre. The First perspective comes from Hernan Cortes, who was controlled by his greed for gold and treasures. This greed in turn fueled Cortes in his decision to commit acts of violence on the native indigenous people of South America. When Cortes arrived in Cholula, he was to be housed and fed. However their food rations eventually were shortened and the city would give off an unfriendly vibe. The natives (Tlaxcalan) would warn Cortez of the double dealing in Cholula would prove to be true. Cortez would leave the city and travel to Tenochtitlan. It is well known that the king of Tenochtitlan had qualms about Cortez, and did not approve of his stay. At the end of the attack, both the native people and Cortez both bore witness to this tragic event, as did Bernal Diaz del Castillo. In the second perspective, Bernal Diaz del Castillo, we are told that the entire mission of these men was to peacefully spread the good news of salvation to the indigenous people. Through Castillo's account, it is suggested that Cortes proposed that the people of Cholula and Tlaxcala must enter into a treaty in order to end the hatred. After the fighting, which according to Bernal Diaz del Castillo, was by the Cholulan's choice. Throughout the Castillo's testimony, it is obvious that the Cholulan's were taking orders from Montezuma to prepare for war, f...

Checklist for Editing Paragraphs and Essays

Checklist for Editing Paragraphs and Essays Editing is a way of thinking critically and reading carefully.(C. Friend and D. Challenger, Contemporary Editing. Routledge, 2014) After revising an essay (perhaps several times) until were satisfied with its basic content and structure, we still need to edit our work. In other words, we need to examine our sentences to make sure that each one is clear, concise, forceful, and free of mistakes. Use this checklist as a guide when editing paragraphs and essays. Is each sentence clear and complete?Can any short, choppy sentences be improved by combining them?Can any long, awkward sentences be improved by breaking them down into shorter units and recombining them?Can any wordy sentences be made more concise?Can any run-on sentences be more effectively coordinated or subordinated?Does each verb agree with its subject?Are all verb forms correct and consistent?Do pronouns refer clearly to the appropriate nouns?Do all modifying words and phrases refer clearly to the words they are intended to modify?Is each word in the essay appropriate and effective?Is each word spelled correctly?Is the punctuation correct? See also:Revision and Editing Checklist for a Critical Essay

Construction Safety Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Construction Safety - Research Paper Example The employee might as a result claim against the undue termination. However, â€Å"An â€Å"at-will† employer - that is, an employer who reserves the right to terminate employees without cause - generally does not need to worry about such claims.† (Muskovitz, 2010). The employee’s act of informing OSHA is fairly justified since this tends to develop a culture of respect for humanity and civilization. OSHA is a statutory body that has a right to interfere with the business for good without having to gain the consent of the employers only because government has trust in OSHA’s laws and proceedings. The employee’s attempt to inform OSHA about the unethical instructions of his employer is ethical because this would cause the employer to be careful about the OSHA considerations of his instructions. $15,000 is a big amount and OSHA could not have charged the employer this amount unless he was proved guilty of having committed a serious offense against the rules of OSHA. OSHA is meant to ensure health and safety on site and if the employee’s call to OSHA made it impose such a large fine on the employer, it means that the employee’s action was

Case study of 2007 Mattel toy recall Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Case study of 2007 Mattel toy recall - Essay Example The result was that the company had to recall the major part of its production as the toys manufactured by the contractors contained toxic components. For instance, its toy Sarge contained high levels of lead, and some other items such as Batman, Polly Pocket and Doggie Daycare contained powerful magnets that could be easily swallowed by children. This paper will analyze to what extent Mattel Inc demonstrated its legal and ethical responsibility while responding to the issue. It will also discuss the role of other parties involved. Finally, the paper will suggest an essential approach for the society to ensure that their children are protected from harmful toys. 1. Evidently, Mattel acted in a responsible way by performing a series of product recalls in 2007. Although the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced Mattel’s five initial recalls on August 14, subsequently, on 4th September, Mattel announced the recall of other items that contained lead and harmful magnets (Case study). This was the real indication of the firm’s ethical and social responsibility toward the entire world. At the same time, the incident shows that Mattel must reconsider its outsourcing or international business strategies. Evidently, Mattel did not clearly analyze the risk factors associated with outsourcing business in China. It also failed to forecast the likeliness of â€Å"quality compromise† while choosing Chinese contractors. These strategic flaws cause people to doubt the ethical accountability of the firm as well as the effectiveness of current regulations. Although Mattel’s strategic decision on producing toys in China flawed, the way the firm responded to the 2007 issue was very substantial. Mattel has been very keen on maintaining its public transparency despite certain issues such as that of the 2007 recall. As Lawrence and Weber (2010) point out, in 1997 Mattel developed its own detailed code of conduct and since then, it added i ts genuine effort to comply with the code in every aspect with the extended help from ICCA, an independent audit firm. For instance, the issue associated with Mexican plants, where workers complained that they had to â€Å"stand without a break for eight hours a day,† was immediately addressed by the company in a very reasonable way (p. 104). As per the SICCA report, Mattel Inc in 1997 defined its â€Å"global code of conduct (Global Manufacturing Principles) for its production facilities and contract manufactures†; and the GMP â€Å"covers such issues as wages and hours, child labor, forced labor, discrimination, freedom of association, legal and ethical business practices, health and safety, protection of the environment, and respect for local culture, values, and traditions† (SICCA, 2010). Again, as the case study states, in China itself Mattel had its own facilities and special test labs for testing the quality of the products; and the company had its own sp ecific standards with regard to the levels of lead in paint. Undoubtedly, the company initiated an extensive investigation in â€Å"July after a European retailer found that paint on a Mattel product† (Case study). Moreover, the company never wanted to hide its fault and instead, informed the world that it was earnestly trying to resolve the issue in union with the Consumer Product Safety Commission in the United States and other

Case study of 2007 Mattel toy recall Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Case study of 2007 Mattel toy recall - Essay Example The result was that the company had to recall the major part of its production as the toys manufactured by the contractors contained toxic components. For instance, its toy Sarge contained high levels of lead, and some other items such as Batman, Polly Pocket and Doggie Daycare contained powerful magnets that could be easily swallowed by children. This paper will analyze to what extent Mattel Inc demonstrated its legal and ethical responsibility while responding to the issue. It will also discuss the role of other parties involved. Finally, the paper will suggest an essential approach for the society to ensure that their children are protected from harmful toys. 1. Evidently, Mattel acted in a responsible way by performing a series of product recalls in 2007. Although the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced Mattel’s five initial recalls on August 14, subsequently, on 4th September, Mattel announced the recall of other items that contained lead and harmful magnets (Case study). This was the real indication of the firm’s ethical and social responsibility toward the entire world. At the same time, the incident shows that Mattel must reconsider its outsourcing or international business strategies. Evidently, Mattel did not clearly analyze the risk factors associated with outsourcing business in China. It also failed to forecast the likeliness of â€Å"quality compromise† while choosing Chinese contractors. These strategic flaws cause people to doubt the ethical accountability of the firm as well as the effectiveness of current regulations. Although Mattel’s strategic decision on producing toys in China flawed, the way the firm responded to the 2007 issue was very substantial. Mattel has been very keen on maintaining its public transparency despite certain issues such as that of the 2007 recall. As Lawrence and Weber (2010) point out, in 1997 Mattel developed its own detailed code of conduct and since then, it added i ts genuine effort to comply with the code in every aspect with the extended help from ICCA, an independent audit firm. For instance, the issue associated with Mexican plants, where workers complained that they had to â€Å"stand without a break for eight hours a day,† was immediately addressed by the company in a very reasonable way (p. 104). As per the SICCA report, Mattel Inc in 1997 defined its â€Å"global code of conduct (Global Manufacturing Principles) for its production facilities and contract manufactures†; and the GMP â€Å"covers such issues as wages and hours, child labor, forced labor, discrimination, freedom of association, legal and ethical business practices, health and safety, protection of the environment, and respect for local culture, values, and traditions† (SICCA, 2010). Again, as the case study states, in China itself Mattel had its own facilities and special test labs for testing the quality of the products; and the company had its own sp ecific standards with regard to the levels of lead in paint. Undoubtedly, the company initiated an extensive investigation in â€Å"July after a European retailer found that paint on a Mattel product† (Case study). Moreover, the company never wanted to hide its fault and instead, informed the world that it was earnestly trying to resolve the issue in union with the Consumer Product Safety Commission in the United States and other

Case study of 2007 Mattel toy recall Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Case study of 2007 Mattel toy recall - Essay Example The result was that the company had to recall the major part of its production as the toys manufactured by the contractors contained toxic components. For instance, its toy Sarge contained high levels of lead, and some other items such as Batman, Polly Pocket and Doggie Daycare contained powerful magnets that could be easily swallowed by children. This paper will analyze to what extent Mattel Inc demonstrated its legal and ethical responsibility while responding to the issue. It will also discuss the role of other parties involved. Finally, the paper will suggest an essential approach for the society to ensure that their children are protected from harmful toys. 1. Evidently, Mattel acted in a responsible way by performing a series of product recalls in 2007. Although the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced Mattel’s five initial recalls on August 14, subsequently, on 4th September, Mattel announced the recall of other items that contained lead and harmful magnets (Case study). This was the real indication of the firm’s ethical and social responsibility toward the entire world. At the same time, the incident shows that Mattel must reconsider its outsourcing or international business strategies. Evidently, Mattel did not clearly analyze the risk factors associated with outsourcing business in China. It also failed to forecast the likeliness of â€Å"quality compromise† while choosing Chinese contractors. These strategic flaws cause people to doubt the ethical accountability of the firm as well as the effectiveness of current regulations. Although Mattel’s strategic decision on producing toys in China flawed, the way the firm responded to the 2007 issue was very substantial. Mattel has been very keen on maintaining its public transparency despite certain issues such as that of the 2007 recall. As Lawrence and Weber (2010) point out, in 1997 Mattel developed its own detailed code of conduct and since then, it added i ts genuine effort to comply with the code in every aspect with the extended help from ICCA, an independent audit firm. For instance, the issue associated with Mexican plants, where workers complained that they had to â€Å"stand without a break for eight hours a day,† was immediately addressed by the company in a very reasonable way (p. 104). As per the SICCA report, Mattel Inc in 1997 defined its â€Å"global code of conduct (Global Manufacturing Principles) for its production facilities and contract manufactures†; and the GMP â€Å"covers such issues as wages and hours, child labor, forced labor, discrimination, freedom of association, legal and ethical business practices, health and safety, protection of the environment, and respect for local culture, values, and traditions† (SICCA, 2010). Again, as the case study states, in China itself Mattel had its own facilities and special test labs for testing the quality of the products; and the company had its own sp ecific standards with regard to the levels of lead in paint. Undoubtedly, the company initiated an extensive investigation in â€Å"July after a European retailer found that paint on a Mattel product† (Case study). Moreover, the company never wanted to hide its fault and instead, informed the world that it was earnestly trying to resolve the issue in union with the Consumer Product Safety Commission in the United States and other

Rigidity of Puritanism Exposed in Hawthornes Young Goodman Brown Essay

Rigidity of Puritanism Exposed in Young Goodman Brown    Proverbs 10:28 implies the idea of the universality of sin in saying "The prospect of the righteous is joy, but the hopes of the wicked come to nothing."   In "Young Goodman Brown", Nathaniel Hawthorne illustrates this through Brown's actions.   When Brown lives a righteous life with good faith, his thoughts remain pure and happy.   He has a wonderful wife, and he enjoys the presence of everyone.   As he takes his walk into the forest and into evil ways, his hopes and faith disappear.   He no longer loves his wife in the same way, and he despises everyone whom people consider were holy.   When he loses his faith, he loses his happiness.   To regain his happiness, Brown must find his righteousness again. Puritans believe there is no hope for a sinner.   Hawthorne uses a variety of writing techniques to condemn the rigidity of Puritanism.      Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   For example, Hawthorne uses a wide variety of diction to create a mystical and hopeless mood.   As Brown walks into the "dreary" forest, an " uncertain" feeling comes over him as he looks ahead to the "gloom" awaiting him.   The forest is very dark and dreary and these words help create the eerie mood.   These words create an insecure and unsure feeling in the reader's mind.   The reader feels as if he stands right there on the outskirts of the forest along with Brown. That type of feeling scares even the bravest of men.   Hawthorne also describes the events taking place in the forest as "devilish," "horrid," and "evil."   Evil completely surrounds Brown in the forest.   It puts a thought in him which drives him crazy. These words give a v... ...ands before him with the guilt of sin.      He can never remember these people in the same way in which he wants to. His views on the righteousness of humanity change from good to bad.   Hence, Brown loses his comradery with his neighbors, and he dies a lonely death with no hopeful verse on his tombstone.    Works Cited Benoit, Raymond.   "'Young Goodman Brown': The Second Time Around."   The Nathaniel Hawthorne Review 19 (Spring 1993): 18-21. Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Complete Short Stories of Nathaniel Hawthorne. New York: Doubleday and Co., Inc.,1959. James, Henry. Hawthorne. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997. Martin, Terence. Nathaniel Hawthorne. New York: Twayne Publishers Inc., 1965. Wagenknecht, Edward. Nathaniel Hawthorne - The Man, His Tales and Romances. New York: Continuum Publishing Co., 1989.